Open Access Publishing bubble
Open Access Publishing profile
Open Access Publishing
Bubble
Professional
Open Access Publishing is a professional community focused on providing free, unrestricted access to scholarly articles and research, e...Show more
General Q&A
Open Access Publishing is a movement to make peer-reviewed scholarly research freely available online to anyone, breaking paywall barriers and promoting global information equity.
Community Q&A

Summary

Key Findings

Missionary Zeal

Insider Perspective
Members share a persistent advocacy mindset, treating open access as a global moral imperative rather than just a pragmatic publishing choice.

Tension Hierarchy

Community Dynamics
Internal debates expose a divided loyalty between commercial publishers and fully open, non-profit publishing models, affecting collaboration and trust within the community.

License Vigilance

Gatekeeping Practices
Strict attention to Creative Commons licenses, especially CC-BY, serves as a marker for commitment authenticity, distinguishing insiders who deeply understand licensing nuances.

Terminology Gatekeeping

Communication Patterns
Use of specific jargon like APC, Diamond OA, Green OA creates linguistic boundaries signaling insider expertise while obscuring the complexity from outsiders.
Sub Groups

Academic Librarians

Focus on institutional repositories, policy advocacy, and supporting researchers with open access compliance.

Researchers & Authors

Engage in discussions about publishing options, funding mandates, and sharing their work openly.

Publishers & Platform Developers

Work on open access journal platforms, infrastructure, and standards.

Open Science & Open Data Advocates

Promote broader open research practices, including open data and reproducibility.

Statistics and Demographics

Platform Distribution
1 / 3
Conferences & Trade Shows
30%

Major engagement occurs at academic and publishing conferences where open access policies, technologies, and collaborations are discussed and advanced.

Professional Settings
offline
Universities & Colleges
20%

Universities are central to open access initiatives, with librarians, faculty, and researchers actively participating in policy, advocacy, and implementation.

Educational Settings
offline
Professional Associations
15%

Professional associations in publishing, librarianship, and research coordinate open access advocacy, standards, and community-building.

Professional Settings
offline
Gender & Age Distribution
MaleFemale55%45%
13-1718-2425-3435-4445-5455-6465+1%10%30%25%18%12%4%
Ideological & Social Divides
Heritage LibrariansPolicy AdvocatesPlatform EngineersIndustry PublishersWorldview (Traditional → Futuristic)Social Situation (Lower → Upper)
Community Development

Insider Knowledge

Terminology
Author RightsCopyright Retention

Non-members say 'author rights' generally; insiders emphasize 'copyright retention' to indicate transfer of rights retention by authors.

OA JournalsFully Open Access Journals

Outsiders say 'OA journals' which may be ambiguous, while insiders specify 'fully open access journals' to clarify no subscription is involved.

Gold AccessGold Open Access

Outside observers say 'gold access' broadly; insiders use 'gold open access' to describe immediate access via the publisher.

Green AccessGreen Open Access

Non-experts might refer to 'green access' informally, while insiders use the full term to specify self-archiving in repositories.

Free ArticlesOpen Access Articles

Casual observers often describe articles as simply 'free,' while insiders specify 'Open Access' to emphasize unrestricted reuse rights.

OA PoliciesOpen Access Mandates

Outside the community, policies enabling OA are casually termed 'OA policies,' but dedicated members use 'mandates' to reflect institutional or funder requirements.

Preprint ServersPreprint Repositories

Casual observers refer to platforms as 'preprint servers,' the community prefers 'repositories' highlighting their archive function.

Paywalled JournalsSubscription Journals

Outsiders call them 'paywalled' focusing on access barriers; insiders use 'subscription journals' to denote the traditional business model.

Library Budget CutsTransformative Agreements

Outside the field, budget issues are described generally; insiders use 'transformative agreements' to refer to contracts shifting subscription costs to OA publishing.

OA FeeArticle Processing Charge (APC)

Laypersons call it an 'OA fee,' but insiders use 'APC' to precisely denote fees paid to publish open access.

Greeting Salutations
Example Conversation
Insider
Have you deposited in the repository today?
Outsider
Deposited? What do you mean by that?
Insider
It means uploading your accepted manuscript to an institutional or subject repository to ensure open access.
Outsider
Ah, I see! That sounds like a good way to share research widely.
Cultural Context
This greeting underscores the OA community’s emphasis on repository self-archiving as a daily norm and a mark of commitment to openness.
Inside Jokes

"Pay the APC or perish"

A tongue-in-cheek phrase highlighting the pressure on authors to pay sometimes costly article processing charges to get their research openly published.

"Green OA is the Sunday stroll after the Gold OA marathon"

Humorous way to describe Green OA as a slower, secondary route to open access compared to the immediate Gold OA.
Facts & Sayings

Gold OA

Refers to publishing in journals where all articles are openly available immediately, often funded by article processing charges (APCs).

Green OA

The practice of self-archiving a version of a published article in a repository, usually after an embargo period imposed by the publisher.

Diamond OA

Open Access journals that do not charge readers or authors, often supported by institutions or consortia.

APCs

Article Processing Charges charged by some journals to cover publication costs, a common funding model in Gold OA.

Preprint

A version of a scholarly paper that precedes formal peer review and publication, shared openly to accelerate dissemination.
Unwritten Rules

Always check the journal’s license before submitting.

To ensure compliance with funder mandates and allow the desired reuse rights, insiders verify that the journal’s OA license is compatible.

Respect embargo periods for Green OA deposits.

Although the goal is openness, the community honors publisher policies on embargoes to maintain relationships and sustainability.

Promote OA through advocacy and education.

Sharing knowledge and advancing OA policies is considered a communal duty, not just individual benefit.

Use CC-BY licenses by default unless funders or policies require otherwise.

This maximizes reusability and aligns with the community’s openness goals.
Fictional Portraits

Elena, 34

Researcherfemale

Elena is a biomedical researcher in a public university who passionately advocates for open access to scientific publications to make research accessible worldwide.

TransparencyEquityCollaboration
Motivations
  • Ensure broad dissemination of her research findings
  • Support global equity in access to knowledge
  • Increase citation and impact of her work
Challenges
  • Navigating publication fees charged by some open access journals
  • Concerns about journal quality and peer review integrity
  • Lack of awareness or resistance among colleagues about open access benefits
Platforms
ResearchGateAcademic conferencesUniversity seminars
APC (Article Processing Charge)PreprintGold OAGreen OA

Marcus, 46

Librarianmale

Marcus manages electronic resources at a major public library and drives open access initiatives to maximize public availability of scholarly materials.

AccessibilityEducationStewardship
Motivations
  • Increase public access to academic resources
  • Reduce costs to institutions and patrons
  • Educate users about open access benefits
Challenges
  • Budget constraints limiting acquisition options
  • Dealing with publisher restrictions
  • Keeping staff and patrons informed about changing open access policies
Platforms
Library forumsProfessional LinkedIn groupsWorkshops
Embargo periodHybrid journalInstitutional repositoryCreative Commons licenses

Sofia, 28

Platform Developerfemale

Sofia develops software platforms that support open access publishing workflows, making the submission and dissemination processes seamless.

OpennessCollaborationInnovation
Motivations
  • Build user-friendly tools to streamline open access
  • Enable transparent peer review and data sharing
  • Foster community-driven innovation in publishing tech
Challenges
  • Balancing feature requests with open source resource limits
  • Integrating diverse systems and standards
  • Keeping up with evolving publishing policies
Platforms
Slack channelsGitHub repositoriesVirtual hackathons
OAI-PMHAPI endpointsMetadata standardsOpen source licensing

Insights & Background

Historical Timeline
Main Subjects
Concepts

Gold Open Access

Publishing model where articles are immediately made free by the publisher, often with an article processing charge (APC).
APC-DrivenImmediate AccessJournal Model

Green Open Access

Self‐archiving route where authors deposit versions of manuscripts in repositories, sometimes after embargo.
Repository-BasedEmbargo OptionAuthor-Led

Plan S

Coalition policy requiring that research funded by certain agencies must be published in compliant OA venues.
Funders’ MandatecOAlition SPolicy Driver

Creative Commons Licenses

Standardized licensing suite (e.g. CC BY) that dictates reuse rights for OA content.
Reuse RightsStandardizedLegal Framework

Scholarly Communication

The ecosystem of creating, evaluating, sharing, and preserving research outputs, central to OA’s mission.
Systemic ViewAcademic WorkflowLifecycle

Article Processing Charge (APC)

Fee model often used by gold OA journals to cover publishing costs, controversial for equity issues.
Cost BarrierEquity ConcernFunding Model

Diamond Open Access

OA model without fees for authors or readers, typically subsidized by institutions or consortia.
No-FeeCommunity-FundedEquitable

Open Data

Principle and practice of making research data freely available to complement OA publications.
FAIR PrinciplesData ReuseTransparency
1 / 3

First Steps & Resources

Get-Started Steps
Time to basics: 2-3 weeks
1

Understand Open Access Models

2-3 hoursBasic
Summary: Learn about gold, green, and hybrid open access models and their implications for publishing.
Details: Begin by familiarizing yourself with the core concepts of open access (OA) publishing, including the different models: gold (immediate open access via journals), green (self-archiving in repositories), and hybrid (subscription journals offering OA options). Use reputable sources like university library guides or OA advocacy organizations to understand the benefits, challenges, and controversies of each model. Beginners often confuse these models or overlook nuances like licensing and embargo periods. Take notes, create comparison charts, and discuss your findings in online forums to clarify your understanding. This foundational knowledge is crucial for meaningful participation in OA discussions and for making informed decisions about publishing or supporting OA. Evaluate your progress by being able to explain each model and its pros/cons to someone else.
2

Read Key Open Access Declarations

1-2 hoursBasic
Summary: Review foundational documents like the Budapest, Berlin, and Bethesda Open Access declarations.
Details: The OA movement is grounded in several landmark declarations that articulate its principles and goals. Reading the Budapest Open Access Initiative, Berlin Declaration, and Bethesda Statement will give you insight into the ethical, practical, and philosophical foundations of OA. These documents are freely available online and are often referenced in OA discussions. Beginners may find the language formal or dense, so take your time, annotate key points, and look up unfamiliar terms. Understanding these texts will help you engage in conversations with established community members and recognize the historical context of current debates. Assess your progress by summarizing each declaration’s main points and reflecting on how they shape OA practices today.
3

Join Open Access Community Forums

2-4 hoursIntermediate
Summary: Register and participate in OA-focused online forums or mailing lists to observe and join discussions.
Details: Engaging with the OA community is essential for learning current issues, best practices, and networking. Identify active forums, mailing lists, or social media groups dedicated to OA publishing—many are hosted by academic libraries, advocacy groups, or professional societies. Start by reading existing threads to understand the tone and topics, then introduce yourself and ask beginner questions. Common challenges include feeling overwhelmed by jargon or hesitating to participate. Overcome this by focusing on beginner-friendly threads and gradually contributing. This step helps you build connections, stay updated on developments, and get practical advice. Measure your progress by actively participating in at least one discussion and receiving feedback or responses from community members.
Welcoming Practices

Introducing newcomers to Open Access Week activities.

Participating in Open Access Week is a key welcoming ritual that integrates newcomers into the advocacy culture and global OA network.
Beginner Mistakes

Assuming OA journals do not do peer review.

Learn that OA refers to accessibility, not editorial standards; always verify the journal’s review process.

Ignoring the significance of licensing terms.

Understand the nuances of Creative Commons licenses to avoid undermining reuse rights or breaching funder requirements.
Pathway to Credibility

Tap a pathway step to view details

Facts

Regional Differences
Europe

Many European countries have strong funder mandates requiring immediate OA publishing with APC support, led by initiatives like Plan S.

North America

North American institutions often emphasize Green OA and repository development alongside Gold OA, with varied APC funding policies.

Asia

Asia’s OA landscape is diverse; some countries have rapidly growing Gold OA publishing, while others emphasize institutional repositories due to funding constraints.

Misconceptions

Misconception #1

Open Access means anyone can publish anything for free without quality control.

Reality

OA still requires rigorous peer review and editorial standards; it is about accessibility, not lowering quality.

Misconception #2

Open Access publishing only benefits readers, not authors.

Reality

OA can increase research visibility and citation rates, benefiting authors by widening their audience.

Misconception #3

All open access journals charge APCs.

Reality

Many OA journals, especially Diamond OA, do not charge authors any fees and rely on alternative funding.
Clothing & Styles

Open Access Conference T-shirts

Worn at events like Open Access Week to show community involvement and commitment to OA principles.

Feedback

How helpful was the information in Open Access Publishing?