Development Economics bubble
Development Economics profile
Development Economics
Bubble
Professional
Knowledge
Development Economics is a community of economists, practitioners, and researchers focused on understanding and advancing economic grow...Show more
General Q&A
Development Economics studies how to foster sustainable growth and reduce poverty, especially in the Global South, using rigorous economic analysis and policy evaluation.
Community Q&A

Summary

Key Findings

Methodological Rite

Social Norms
In Development Economics, conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a credentialing ritual that signals deep insider status, shaping who leads debates and influences policy within the community.

Global Gatekeeping

Gatekeeping Practices
Membership revolves around elite institutional ties and participation in flagship conferences like NEUDC, creating an insider network that controls discourse and resource access.

Ethics Debate

Opinion Shifts
The community is deeply divided over ethical research practices and decolonizing development, sparking intense internal conflicts over power, representation, and methodology.

Signal Networks

Identity Markers
Members signal belonging through circulation of working papers on sites like SSRN/NBER and citing shared jargon, distinguishing insiders from outsiders who conflate them with general economics or charity.
Sub Groups

Academic Researchers

University-based economists and graduate students focused on theoretical and empirical research.

Policy Practitioners

Professionals working in NGOs, international organizations, and governments implementing development policy.

Field Researchers

Economists and practitioners conducting field experiments and impact evaluations in developing countries.

Students & Early Career Economists

Individuals seeking education, mentorship, and entry into the field.

Online Discussion Groups

Members who primarily engage through online forums and social media for debate and resource sharing.

Statistics and Demographics

Platform Distribution
1 / 3
Universities & Colleges
25%

Development Economics is deeply rooted in academic research, with universities serving as primary hubs for research, teaching, and collaboration.

Educational Settings
offline
Conferences & Trade Shows
20%

Major engagement occurs at academic and policy conferences where development economists present research, network, and shape the field.

Professional Settings
offline
Professional Associations
15%

Associations like the American Economic Association and regional equivalents foster ongoing professional engagement and collaboration.

Professional Settings
offline
Gender & Age Distribution
MaleFemale60%40%
13-1718-2425-3435-4445-5455-6465+1%10%30%25%18%10%6%
Ideological & Social Divides
Field PractitionersAcademic ScholarsPolicy AdvisorsWorldview (Traditional → Futuristic)Social Situation (Lower → Upper)
Community Development

Insider Knowledge

Terminology
Aid EffectivenessAdditionality

Insiders use 'additionality' to assess whether aid provides extra resources beyond existing flows, unlike the vague term aid effectiveness.

Economic GrowthGDP Growth

Casual observers refer broadly to economic progress, while insiders specify GDP Growth as a key measurable indicator of development.

Jobs CreationLabor Market Interventions

Insiders focus on labor market interventions designed to improve employment outcomes, beyond general job creation talk.

Poor CountriesLow- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)

The general term 'poor countries' is replaced by LMICs to classify countries based on income thresholds set by global institutions.

MicrofinanceMicrocredit Programs

Although similar, insiders distinguish microfinance broadly from specific microcredit lending programs.

Foreign InvestmentForeign Direct Investment (FDI)

Insiders use FDI to refer specifically to investment via ownership/control in foreign enterprises, a critical concept in development.

AidOfficial Development Assistance (ODA)

Outsiders say aid generally, but insiders use ODA to refer specifically to government-sponsored funds conforming to international standards.

ExperimentRandomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

While 'experiment' is general, RCTs are rigorous study designs favored in development economics to establish causality.

Helping the PoorPoverty Alleviation

Insiders prefer the technical term 'poverty alleviation' to describe systematic efforts, unlike the casual phrase 'helping the poor.'

Government PolicyStructural Adjustment Programs (SAPs)

SAPs refer to policy prescriptions by international institutions affecting development, a term rarely used by casual observers.

Greeting Salutations
Example Conversation
Insider
Did you run any RCTs?
Outsider
Huh? What does 'run an RCT' mean?
Insider
It means conducting randomized controlled trials to test development programs rigorously.
Outsider
Oh, so it's like an experiment to see if something works?
Insider
Exactly, it's key for evidence-based policy in our field.
Cultural Context
This greeting references a common methodological approach, signaling familiarity with development economics research norms.
Inside Jokes

'Fortune cookie economics'

A humorous critique of overly optimistic or simplistic economic predictions that development economists sometimes poke fun at among themselves.
Facts & Sayings

RCTs

Refers to 'randomized controlled trials,' a gold-standard experimental method used to test the effectiveness of development interventions.

Poverty traps

Describes situations where individuals or communities cannot escape poverty without external help, a central concept for targeting aid.

Conditional cash transfers

Programs that provide money to poor households contingent upon behaviors like school attendance or health check-ups, often discussed as policy tools.

Impact evaluation

The process of rigorously measuring the causal effects of development programs to determine what works and what doesn’t.
Unwritten Rules

Always cite the latest working papers from NBER or SSRN when presenting research.

Demonstrates engagement with cutting-edge research and situates your work within ongoing discussions.

Emphasize methodological rigor before policy conclusions.

Shows respect for the scientific process and avoids politicizing data prematurely.

Acknowledge ethical concerns honestly when discussing experiments.

Builds credibility and trust within the community given the sensitivity of fieldwork in vulnerable populations.

Don’t dismiss qualitative insights despite a focus on quantitative analysis.

Recognizes the complexity of development challenges that numbers alone can’t capture.
Fictional Portraits

Amina, 32

Researcherfemale

Amina is an economic researcher from Kenya specializing in field experiments to study poverty alleviation policies.

Impact-driven researchCultural sensitivityCollaborative innovation
Motivations
  • Creating evidence-based policies to improve living standards
  • Collaborating with international organizations for sustainable development
  • Bridging academic research with real-world impact
Challenges
  • Limited funding and logistical constraints for field studies in rural areas
  • Balancing rigorous methodology with local cultural contexts
  • Translating complex economic findings into accessible policy recommendations
Platforms
Research collaboration platformsProfessional LinkedIn groupsInternational development conferences
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT)Poverty traps

Luis, 45

PolicyAdvisormale

Luis is a policy advisor in a Latin American development agency, focusing on economic reforms to reduce inequality in middle-income countries.

PragmatismEquitySustainability
Motivations
  • Designing policies that foster inclusive growth
  • Integrating macroeconomic stability with social welfare programs
  • Learning from successful development models globally
Challenges
  • Navigating political resistance to reforms
  • Limited reliable data for policy formulation
  • Balancing short-term pressures with long-term economic goals
Platforms
Government committeesDevelopment economics workshopsPolicy forums
Structural adjustmentFiscal decentralizationInclusive growth

Nina, 24

GraduateStudentfemale

Nina is an early-career graduate student in Europe, passionate about employing data science to study global poverty alleviation.

CuriosityRigorOpen collaboration
Motivations
  • Mastering cutting-edge quantitative methods
  • Connecting with seasoned professionals for guidance
  • Contributing to research that can direct effective interventions
Challenges
  • Access to comprehensive and high-quality datasets
  • Lack of practical experience in field conditions
  • Difficulty in networking with established economists
Platforms
University seminarsAcademic conference Discord channelsSlack groups for research collaboration
Instrumental variablesPropensity score matchingMicrofinance

Insights & Background

Historical Timeline
Main Subjects
People

Amartya Sen

Introduced capabilities approach and welfare economics foundations for development policy.
Nobel LaureateCapabilities Thinker

Esther Duflo

Co-founder of J-PAL, pioneer in randomized controlled trials for policy evaluation.
RCT InnovatorPolicy Pragmatist

Abhijit Banerjee

Co-founder of J-PAL, key figure in experimental development economics.
RCT InnovatorFieldwork Champion

Michael Kremer

Early adopter of RCTs in education and health interventions, Nobel Prize co-winner.
RCT PioneerEducation Focus

Jeffrey Sachs

Advocate of big-push strategies and Millennium Development Goals framework.
Big-Push AdvocateMDG Architect

Angus Deaton

Analyzed consumption, health, and well-being in low-income settings; Nobel Prize winner.
Consumption ExpertWell-Being Analyst

Paul Collier

Known for work on the bottom billion, resource curse, and conflict economics.
Resource Curse AnalystConflict Economist

Kaushik Basu

Former Chief Economist at World Bank, contributions to game theory in development.
Game TheoryPolicy Broker

Lant Pritchett

Critic of one-size-fits-all growth models; emphasizes state capacity and governance.
Governance CriticState Capacity

Esther Boserup

Pioneered theories on agricultural change and women's role in economic development.
Agriculture TheoristGender Focus
1 / 3

First Steps & Resources

Get-Started Steps
Time to basics: 4-6 weeks
1

Read Foundational Texts

1-2 weeksBasic
Summary: Start with core development economics books and articles to grasp key theories and debates.
Details: Begin your journey by reading foundational texts in development economics. Focus on classic books and influential articles that introduce the main theories, historical context, and ongoing debates. This step is crucial because it grounds you in the vocabulary, conceptual frameworks, and questions that shape the field. Seek out reading lists from university syllabi or recommendations from respected practitioners. Common challenges include dense academic language and unfamiliar jargon—overcome these by taking notes, looking up terms, and discussing readings with peers. Prioritize understanding concepts like poverty traps, growth models, and the role of institutions. Evaluate your progress by summarizing key arguments in your own words and identifying major schools of thought. This foundational knowledge will help you engage meaningfully with more advanced materials and discussions.
2

Follow Leading Research Outlets

1 week (ongoing)Intermediate
Summary: Regularly read working papers and articles from top development economics journals and organizations.
Details: Stay updated with the latest research by following leading journals, working paper series, and research organizations in development economics. This includes reading recent publications from sources like academic journals, policy briefs, and reports from international organizations. This step is important because the field evolves rapidly, and being aware of current debates, methodologies, and findings is essential for meaningful engagement. Beginners often feel overwhelmed by technical content; start by reading abstracts and executive summaries, then gradually tackle full papers. Focus on identifying research questions, methods used, and policy implications. Track your progress by being able to discuss recent studies and their relevance. Engaging with current research also helps you identify areas of personal interest for deeper exploration.
3

Engage in Online Discussions

2-3 hours (initially)Basic
Summary: Join forums or social media groups to discuss research, ask questions, and connect with practitioners.
Details: Participate in online communities dedicated to development economics. These may include academic forums, social media groups, or specialized discussion boards. Engaging with others allows you to clarify doubts, share perspectives, and learn from practitioners and researchers. Start by reading existing threads to understand community norms, then contribute by asking thoughtful questions or sharing insights from your readings. Beginners may feel intimidated by the expertise of others; overcome this by being respectful, open to feedback, and persistent. This step is vital for building your network, staying motivated, and gaining exposure to diverse viewpoints. Assess your progress by the quality of your interactions and your ability to contribute meaningfully to discussions.
Welcoming Practices

Sharing working papers and datasets

Newcomers are often welcomed by being given access to recent research papers and data sources, enabling faster integration into community knowledge.

Inviting to submit to NEUDC

Encouraging new members to present at the annual NEUDC conference helps socialize them into the community and its ongoing debates.
Beginner Mistakes

Overusing jargon like 'poverty traps' without clear definition.

Always explain technical terms when first used to ensure clarity and inclusive conversation.

Ignoring ethical implications of experimental design.

Proactively address ethics in research proposals and discussions to build trust and credibility.
Pathway to Credibility

Tap a pathway step to view details

Facts

Regional Differences
North America

North American institutions often focus heavily on empirical micro-level RCTs and impact evaluations.

Europe

European development economists sometimes emphasize qualitative methods and broader structural issues more prominently than in other regions.

Asia

In Asia, there is growing emphasis on integrating local knowledge and decolonial perspectives into mainstream development economics.

Misconceptions

Misconception #1

Development economics is just charity work or aid distribution.

Reality

It is a rigorous empirical discipline focused on understanding and designing policies for growth and poverty alleviation using scientific methods.

Misconception #2

RCTs are unethical because they withhold aid from control groups.

Reality

RCTs are carefully designed with ethical oversight to ensure no one is denied standard care, and they generate critical evidence needed to improve programs.

Misconception #3

Development economics is uniform globally with a single approach.

Reality

There are diverse methodological and ideological perspectives, often influenced by regional and institutional contexts.

Feedback

How helpful was the information in Development Economics?